FOUNDATIONS OF MANAGEMENT – MGMT 302
Spring
Semester, 2000
Section
#1
T
3:00 – 4:50
ACD 302
Instructor:
Thomas J. Weir, MBA
Office:
USB
Telephone:
760.750.4607
Office
Hours:
Tuesday 5:00 ~ 5:30 Craven 1262
e-mail:
tweir@mailhost1.csusm.edu
This course explores important concepts and applications in management including motivation, leadership, group dynamics, organization design, decision-making, communication, and organization change.
Robbins, Stephen P., Organizational Behavior, Prentice-Hall, 1997 (8th Edition)
Sent via e-mail attachment as appropriate.
Delivery
of information follows a modified interactive format. This is to say, “Questions
drive the lecture, not the lecture driving the questions”. Therefore, it is
imperative that you complete the assigned readings, assigned end-of chapter
questions and CD Video Previews prior to each class meeting. Class
discussions, presentations and theory overview highlight each of our meetings.
All writing assignments are due at the beginning of class. Late assignments
are not acceptable thus ‘earning’ a zero point value.
A
vital dimension of this format includes the weekly preparation of a case or
video analysis. The cases referenced in the “Deliverables Section” as “KF”
refer to the Knitting Factory Videos contained on the CD disc supplied with
your textbook. Use the overview on the page indicated referencing the video
sets. Prepare your discussion responses to general questions at the end of the
overview section. For those cases listed as Case Inciden
Save
your money and do not put your Executive Summaries in folders, “slick-50”
plastic report covers, leather-bound volumes or have them spiral bound.
Sometimes ‘more is better’, but in this case ONE staple in the top
left-hand corner is all the binding expertise I require.
Class
discussion becomes the vehicle whereby we agree to disagree. My
responsibilities equate to that of a Facilitator. I will keep the discussions
on-track and focused while adding clarification to the theories and models
presented in the text. This method of scholastic discourse allows all of us
the opportunity for enhanced learning while developing heightened levels of
professional growth. I do not permit any form of ridicule, sarcasm or rudeness
during our open discussion sessions.
The University sets as a minimum standard, a 2,500 word writing requirement for each course. This is not to say however, that the instructor cannot exceed this minimum. There are only four written assignments for this semester. It is expected that each written assignment be word-processed. The parameters on style, font sizing and spacing underwent discussion in the previous section. I expect students to already write at the college level.
Spelling and grammatical errors should be minimized in today’s technological environment. I expect attention to detail; hence, an Executive Summary containing 3 or more errors must be corrected and re-submitted for credit. A returned Executive Summary looses 10% of its total possible value on its first re-write. If the Summary contains errors upon the second submission, the total point value for that Summary is zero points. No sense in submitting it the third time!
Because this course and your colleagues depend upon your considerable participation, you should attend regularly. Missing more than 2 class sessions will lower your final course grade. If an emergency arises and you cannot make a class meeting, I must be notified by either telephone or e-mail at least 1 hour before the scheduled meeting time; medical or a family crises not withstanding. If the later, please notify me as soon as the situation allows.
Course Prerequisites
The pre-requisites for this course are listed in the course catalogue. The instructor reserves the right to administratively drop, at any point, any student who has not met the prerequisites. Students choosing to withdraw from this course are responsible for doing so according to university procedures and deadlines.
Academic dishonesty in any form (cheating, plagiarism, etc.) is not part of our professional culture and will not be tolerated. I encourage, and the class configuration mandates, that we work together in teams and groups in planning, analyzing and presenting ideas and concepts to our colleagues, but your written work should be your own. It is your responsibility to cite another author’s work in the appropriate manner (APA or MLA formats). Each of us must closely adhere to the University’s Code of Academic Integrity. If you are not clear of what constitutes “testing the waters”, ask before you do something that may result in a disciplinary action.
The mid term presentation for this course consists of an Oral Roundtable whereby individual students or student teams of no more than four members, offer responses to specific theoretical questions. The accuracy, delivery and arguments surrounding these questions undergo evaluation by your colleagues – they critique your response (s) as a form of feedback to aid you in the learning experience. I do however; retain ‘veto rights’ to your colleague’s evaluation by either raising or lowering your score as deemed appropriate.
Your final examination is a take-home Executive Summary of the Progressive Case Study, Part II (pg. 234). Using your first case study and Executive Summary as a guideline, offer a new response to the case using all the theories and models that may apply to the scenario. By this juncture, you should have this down to a ‘science’ and completed within 4 to 5 pages, maybe less depending upon your refined capabilities.
Part two of the final consists of a self-evaluation in terms of what you think appropriate for this task. Assign yourself a letter and number grade; i.e. A 4.0, B+ 3.75 etc. Provide a rationale in less than ½ page. Type this evaluation of a separate sheet of paper. Do not attach it to your Executive Summary. No need to staple this one!
Submit your deliverables to the classroom on the date and at the time scheduled for your Final.
Grading Values (as a percent)
Readings and Presentations 15%
Executive Summaries 25%
Mid Term Presentations 25%
Participation/Discussion 15%
Final Examination
20%
|
Date |
Reading
(Robbins) Page # |
Topics |
Deliverables |
|
February 1 |
Admin. Intro. Form Teams/Groups |
Intro to Teams & Groups |
None |
|
February 8 |
2-31; 41-67; 88-122 |
Ind. Behavior, Personality, Perception, Learning |
A-34. Part I Review KF Videos. Discussion Only |
|
February 15 |
130-161 |
Emotions; Attitudes & Values |
A-34 Part II Review KF Videos. Discussion Only |
|
February 22 |
166-197 |
Motivation Theories |
Pg 199 Lincoln Electric Case Incident. Discussion Only |
|
February 29 |
202-229 |
Motivational Techniques & Commitment |
Pg 234 Exec.Summary: Progressive Case, Part II. Rob Panco |
|
March 7 |
624-664 |
Stress, Frustration, Anxiety & Conflict |
A-39 Part IV Review KF Videos. Discussion Only |
|
March 14 |
238-278; 282-301 |
Groups |
Preview KF Videos for Ch. 7 & 8 Discussion Only |
|
March 21 |
Mid Term Presentations |
|
Oral Roundtable |
|
April 4 |
238-278; 282-301 (cont.) |
Groups, Self-Managed Teams |
Pg 306 XEL Communications Case Incident Discussion Only |
|
April 11 |
308-335 |
Relationships & Communications |
Pg 341 Have We Got a
Communication Problem Here? Case Incident. Discussion Only |
|
April 18 |
344-385; 394-423 |
Leadership & Leadership Styles Power & Politics |
Pg 474 Exec. Summary: Progressive Case, Part III. Rob Panco |
|
April 25 |
476-541 |
Organizational Structure & Design |
Review KF Videos for Ch 13 & 14. Discussion Only |
|
May 2 |
550-583 |
Human Resources: Policies & Practices |
Pg 591 ABC News Reverse Discrimination? Discussion Only |
|
May 9 |
432-463 |
Conflict & Negotiation; Organizational Conflicts |
Pg 472 Not Your Dream Team. Case Incident Discussion Only |
|
May 16 |
592-613 |
Corporate Culture & Org. Development |
Pg 622 Exec. Summary; Progressive Case Part IV. Rob Panco |
|
May 23 |
Final Due: ACD 302 2:15 PM. |
|
Final Case Study and Executive Summary |