Community Engaged Scholarship by its very nature is time-consuming work, as is any work that involves authentic partnerships that are mutually beneficial and of a reciprocal nature. A lot of time and effort goes into the process of forging the mutual trust among community and academic partners that underpins CES as well as into the process of developing and implementing a CES project. Yet, university RTP policies privilege outcomes over process.
This webpage is focused on helping you to help your PRC, Dean, PTC members, and Provost recognize the full extent of your work on your CES project so that they can appropriately reward all the accomplishments of your project – the intensive and long-term process, and the non-traditional end products as well as the traditionally-rewarded peer-reviewed products.
Here are some of the challenges involved in valuing and rewarding CES work in the RTP process:
Community-Engaged Scholarship Toolkit
This well-recognized and superb website provides faculty with tools to carefully plan and document their community-engaged scholarship work and produce strong portfolios for the RTP process at all levels.
• Planning for Promotion and Tenure
• Creating a Strong Portfolio
• Portfolio Examples
Database of Faculty Mentors for CES Work and Portfolio Reviewers
This database of faculty mentors and portfolio reviewers is a resource for faculty doing CES work and who wish they had a faculty mentor. The data-base also serves as a resource for PRCs, department chairs, deans, and others who need external experts to review the files of community-engaged faculty who are being considered for retention, promotion and/or tenure. (Note: while this database is run by the Community-Campus Partnerships for Health, their services are for everyone, not just for those engaged in health-related work.)
How about a peer-review process for the products of CES work that do not fit the traditional peer-reviewed mold of academic publications? Well, there is one!
CES4Health is a free system for peer-reviewing, publishing and disseminating the non-scholarly but equally valuable products of community-engaged scholarship such as videos, manuals, curricula, intake forms, and so on. Academics with training in evaluating these types of CES work products conduct the peer-review, which can then be used in the RTP process.
For questions and more information, please contact Dr. Christina Holub, Faculty Director of Community Engaged Scholarship, email@example.com.